![]() ![]() In recent years, Intel has updated this model from a two-step “Tick-Tock” to a three step “Tick-Tock-Optimize” pattern but they are still taking this basic approach. Although the specific engineering developments of each step take longer than one year, by overlapping the activities they can alternate the processor introductions to keep up this one year cadence. If a bug were to develop in a new chip with had both a new process and a new microarchitecture, could they figure out if the problem was because of the manufacturing process or with the microarchitecture? Intel has successfully used this strategy repeatedly over the past 15 years and has kept up the pace of introducing new generations of microprocessors on roughly a yearly basis. The reason Intel does this is because it is just too difficult to innovate on both fronts at the same time. An example was when they moved from the Ivy Bridge to the Haswell microarchitecture in 2013. The second type of innovation is the “Tock” step that introduces a new processor microarchitecture using the same process to improve performance, energy efficiency, and incorporate new features. An example would be when they went from a 32 nm to 22 nm manufacturing process in 2012. The first type is to shrink the manufacturing process using tighter design rules and achieving better transistor performance and smaller die sizes. The idea is that two different types of innovations are needed to continue producing better and better microprocessor chips. ![]() In 2007, Intel adopted a model for microprocessor development which they called “Tick-Tock” (not to be confused with the social media TikTok). Review of the Cirq Quantum Software Framework.IBM Qiskit, Rigetti Forest, Microsoft QDK, Project Q.Other Websites and Industry Associations.Venture Capital – Sorted by Quantum Company. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |