![]() I have no idea why people make this so complicated. This is because of their IF (internal focus) design.ġ8-135mm AF-S (click this for lens review, click links below for comparison images)ġ8-200mm VR (click this for lens review, click links below for comparison images)Ĩ0-200mm AF-S (click this for lens review, click links below for comparison images)Ĩ0-400mm VR (click this for lens review, click links below for comparison images)ħ0-210mm f/4 AF (click this for lens review, click links below for comparison images)ġ05mm f/2.8 Micro AF (click this for lens review, click links below for comparison images)Ĩ0-200mm AF-S at f/2.8 (click this for lens review, click links below for comparison images) You'll notice that the image sizes from the 18-135mm and 18-200mm lenses seems less than the other 135mm lenses. Thus I also set my 80-200 AFS to f/2.8 in the same comparison, as well as at f/5.6. Newspaper photographers and weekend pros all own some kind of 80-200 f/2.8 lens, and pro fashion photographers love 300mm f/2.8 and 400mm f/2.8 lenses. Of course people genuinely concerned about bokeh shoot f/2.8 or faster lenses. They are from my D80 at medium image size. These comparisons are made at 135mm, f/5.6 and 9.5 feet (3m). I got curious, so I compared six of my lenses at 135mm and f/5.6. ![]() ![]() ![]() I noticed that the bokeh of the 18-135mm lens seemed unusually nice when I was making some head shots of a kid. The problem is when they instead become harsh or distracting. Bokeh is how lenses render out-of-focus areas. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |